Ashley is an escort and massage provider in Denver, Colorado, offering incall sessions. Clients describe Ashley as petite. As a reviewer puts it: "A few calls made to set up the meeting and to get to her incall."
Over a year ago
I saw 'Ashley' in a backpage ad, assumed it was unlikely, but she was very close and I wasn't thinking clearly...She is not the girl in the photos, but similar - and she is very good looking physicall... See more
A few calls made to set up the meeting and to get to her incall. I wasn't expecting the girl in the photos, but should have read the earlier review for more details. It could have been a better experience but the chemistry was missing and I should have stayed home. It could be me, but YMMV.
I saw 'Ashley' in a backpage ad, assumed it was unlikely, but she was very close and I wasn't thinking clearly...She is not the girl in the photos, but similar - and she is very good looking physically - petite, but slim with a large bust, very cute. In any case, I called her and she sounded very perky over the phone. Only took a few min to get to her location, a lower end motel north of town, called for room number and went up. Non-vips - I do not recommend...
Anyone can write a Top Ten Reviews review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they'll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Ashley is an escort and massage provider in Denver, Colorado, offering incall sessions. Clients describe Ashley as petite. As a reviewer puts it: "A few calls made to set up the meeting and to get to her incall."
We're all about transparency. Providers and establishments can't pay to alter or remove reviews from Top Ten Reviews.
Reviewers express significant disappointment with Ashley, highlighting a consistent issue with misleading representations. Both customers note that the individual they met did not match the photos advertised, leading to feelings of dissatisfaction. One reviewer mentions making several calls to arrange a meeting, indicating some level of effort in the process, but this does not compensate for the overall negative experience. While one review does acknowledge that the service provided was "very good," it is overshadowed by the dissatisfaction regarding the authenticity of the images. The reviews date back to March 2014, suggesting a long-standing issue with transparency. Overall, the sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with consumers feeling misled and frustrated.
